When Will America Believe, They Are the Government?
Good Morning! I am pleased to be the first to be able to voice my opinion of the question that was asked about “When a government seat is considered to be empty,” and to attempt to relay intelligence concerning “Our System of Governance.” How to exactly fill that empty seat in all seriousness was one of the greatest questions I have found in the year 2017 moving into 2018 for the upcoming “Senate Seats” and where we will get into it today, not only for “Legislative Seats,” but absolutely any seats in any representation for the people of the United States. When we speak of United States, we should immediately think “Federal Government,” but the same process for filling empty seats within our system works all the way up to a “Federal Level.” In regards to your viewpoint that the Constitution is there to provide the answer, I would further like to elaborate the procedures and speak about the rules regarding seats that are not only occupied, but this being the single most important reason, making sure the seats are proper according to the a. Rules b. Regulations c. Legislation d. Guidelines e. Statutes f. Amendments g. Codes h. Pleadings and other things… The seriousness of anyone found “Out of Line” and “Out of Order,” in your opinion, respectfully you had mentioned that it doesn’t matter, but in fact the system depends on all our unified operational focus.
Your questions arise and I will do my best to provide this service:
What if the people find, in their search for some truth or another, that there exist one or more "empty" seats in our representative based government?
I. Legal Standards
A. 18 U.S.C. §1963(a)(1), (2), (3) The specific goal of RICO is to prohibit the use of an enterprise to engage in certain criminal activities. A person who uses an enterprise to engage in a pattern of racketeering may be convicted under the RICO criminal statute (18 U.S.C. §1963). An enterprise is defined as "Any individual, partnership, corporation, association, or other legal entity, and any union or group of individuals associated in fact although not a legal entity." A pattern is defined as "At least two acts of racketeering activity, one of which occurred after the effective date of [RICO's passage] and the last of which occurred within 10 years after commission of a prior act of racketeering activity." "It is also clear that section 1963(a) not only provides criminal penalties for “Whoever” is found in violation of any provision section of §1962 but also further points to section §1961 which makes any “Racketeering Activity” a crime. Actor(s) also further alleged to be in violation to the Hobbs Act, 18 U.S.C §1951(a), which is a RICO predicate offense because section 1951(a) expressly makes conspiracy a crime. Because of the effect of 18 U.S.C. §2, however, one who aids and abets the commission of a federal crime is treated as if “They” had committed the crime as a principal and can be charged under RICO if the crime is one set forth in Section 1961(1)(B)(G). 35 ("aiding and abetting one of the activities listed in Section 1961(1) as racketeering activities makes one punishable as a principal and amounts to engaging in that racketeering activity.) ALL I.N. FEDERAL CRIMINAL R.I.C.O. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA.
How do WE make sure these seats are filled, using the same solution as prescribed for any other empty seat?
B. 18 U.S.C. §371—Conspiracy to Defraud the United States… The general conspiracy statute, 18 U.S.C. §371, creates an offense "If two or more persons conspire either to commit any offense against the United States, or to defraud the United States, or any agency thereof in any manner or for any purpose (emphasis added). See Project, Tenth Annual Survey of White Collar Crime, 32 Am. Crim. L. Rev. 137, 379406 (1995) (generally discussing §371). The operative language is the so called "defraud clause," that prohibits conspiracies to defraud the United States. This clause creates a separate offense from the "offense clause" in Section 371.
Both offenses require the traditional elements of Section 371 conspiracy: 1. Including an illegal agreement such as “The installation of a “Fraudulent Operative” for an “Alleged Seat” of the United States. Further to a believing national and international citizen base within “This United States” and by knowing full well they are owed the truth, but however denying them this right is enforceable.” The answer is make sure they remain empty when fraudulent operatives and actors attempt to fill them by prosecution. In time, the seats will eventually fill with lawful candidates who have seen a working system and have learned through the derelicts mistakes.
How do we force the government to fill them?
C. Criminal intent such as “The intent to commit a federal crime” constitutes their malice, where siding outside of the agencies rule of law, constitutes their intent to deprive and defraud the true owners of their rights protected by the constitution. In criminal law, an overt act, or an open act of one that can be clearly proved by evidence and from which stated above can be deduced or concluded from by the evidence, the reasoning rather than from explicit statements, or inactions, whereby may show these elements as fulfilled. So, in other words, the best way may be to obtain an “Injunction” through “Federal Court” with a “Judicial Signature Authority” and “Seal” finally providing your personal “Service” to the “Derelicts.”
Is it time to form some serious militias for enforcement?
In my opinion yes and because “Federal Law” had remained without enforcement while overt criminals were able to maintain their threat of continuances. The “Unorganized Militia” consists of all able-bodied persons of the nation and of the states between the ages of 17-44, which is exclusive of all members of the organized militia i.e., The Armed Forces of your Federal Government of the United States with the National Guards of the various states of the Union; enforcements are needed as serious forces are necessary to the security of your “Free State.”
Title 10 U.S.C. 311. Militia: composition and classes:
(a) The militia of the United States consists of all able-bodied males at least 17 years of age and except as provided in section 313 of title 32, under 45 years of age who are, or who have made a declaration of intention to become, citizens of the United States and of female citizens of the United States who are members of the National Guard.
(b) The classes of the militia are -
(1) The organized militia, which consists of the National Guard and the Naval Militia…
(2) The unorganized militia, which consists of the members of the militia who are not
members of the National Guard or the Naval Militia…
How can we prove beyond a doubt, that there ARE empty seats?
Now it is well known as the reliance is heavily on the definition of "defraud" provided by the Supreme Court in two early cases, Hass v. Henkel, 216 U.S. 462 (1910), and Hammerschmidt v. United States, 265 U.S. 182 (1924). In Hass the Court stated: “The statute is broad enough in its terms to include any conspiracy for the purpose of impairing, obstructing or defeating the lawful function of any department of government.” Any conspiracy which is calculated to obstruct or impair its efficiency and destroy the value of its operation and reports as fair, impartial and reasonably accurate, would be to defraud the United States by depriving it of its lawful right and duty of promulgating or diffusing the information so officially acquired in the way and at the time required by law or departmental regulation. Hass, 216 U.S. at 479480 and to answer your question it is not your job to “Prove Beyond a Reasonable Doubt” that is the “Federal Prosecutors Job” however the first step is to report the crime to the FBI, but these days you need to have “Judicial Oversight” to force compliance it has gotten so bad within our agencies. There must be record so that enforcement is practical and for the purposes of your rights, it’s best to become a witness and recognize when you are a victim of a federal crime in accordance with 18 U.S.C. §3771, §1512, and §1513; by knowing your rights you can force compliance through the courts all the way up to the Attorney General. The answer is to look to the root power found in the grounds of the constitution. Find the disconnect, in other words if there is something that does not line up in accordance with the law of the land hence the fraud and the critical comparison being statutes light compared to the mortal derelict(s).
Where in the Constitution does it indicate that these seats even exist?
This is what I like to term “Systemic Gnosis” in other words this is only my personal experience that can attempt to provide the answer of where it indicates these seats even exist. The short-sweat answer in my opinion always was the Judge seated in an elevated place above society to remind citizens of their place in understanding the peoples law. A double-edged blade in fact, above the “Judicial Seat” is a seal and in court rooms flags, with other reminders however, the most important reminder is their seated place provided by the people which is or was especially these days “Grace.” It was a place to exercise this “Guardianship” when we had courts and not cults. The fact is when a judge or anyone “Seated” in their place by the people is when you may understand the well-known terminology “Fallen from Grace.” This happens when someone without excuse breaks the law of the land or the peoples’ rules by placing their own heads under the law… Fallen from the bench or the “Seat” or however it is for terminology it is most important to have the “Knowledge” of 1. When exactly this happened or happens & 2. How to enforce compliance or force law to be upheld in a CIVIL MANNER.
Can this be extended to representational seats in the states?
In Hammerschmidt, Chief Justice Taft, defined "defraud" as follows: To conspire to defraud the United States means primarily to cheat the Government out of property or money, but it also means to interfere with or obstruct one of its lawful governmental functions by deceit, craft or trickery, or at least by means that are dishonest. It is not necessary that the Government shall be subjected to property or pecuniary loss by the fraud, but only that its legitimate official action and purpose shall be defeated by misrepresentation, chicane or the overreaching of all of those charged with carrying out their governmental intentions such as “Representational Seats” in the states and which includes “Everyone” alleged “Acting” within our agencies. The defendant(s) may be found in violation of the Hobbs Act, 18 U.S.C §1951(a), which again is a R.I.C.O. predicate offense because section 1951(a) expressly makes conspiracy a crime; because of the effect of 18 U.S.C. §2, however, one who aids and abets the commission of a federal crime is treated as if “They” had committed the crime as a principal and can be charged under RICO if the crime is one set forth in Section 1961(1)(B)(G). 35 ("aiding and abetting one of the activities listed in Section 1961(1) as racketeering activities makes one punishable as a principal and amounts to engaging in that racketeering activity.) your working Justice System.
Whom do we seek out for an answer to these questions?
Simply understand your rights, comprehend “Your True Power” v. “United States Fraud” as you may decide to coordinate with other “Witnesses” or “Victims,” by doing so… Finding yourselves possibly encouraging your “Secretary of Defense” or “The Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff,” respectfully demanding “Federal Law Enforcement.” This starts the clock where “Military Jurisdiction” eventually grafts in or in other words is acquired. Therefore, it is without discretion “The Racketeer Influenced Corrupt Organizations Act” shall be ENFORCED.
Thank you for your invaluable questions today Monday September, 25th 2017 and may you find yourselves getting to the bottom of all derelict employees who are found without a doubt with your witness out of line and out of order. All states including Texas citizens who operate within their wonderful union are directed to always without fear to do the same in the spirit of true government accountability. Border protection starts within your state and county level, getting your agents in line is getting your national protection which includes immigrant invasion defense. If you find “Retaliatory” erroneous filings simply assert your rights in their attempts, especially under their attempts as a 1. Victim or 2. Witness of a “Federal Crime.” If they attempt to kidnap you simply say these four lovely words for your personal protection “I do not consent.” Threatening witnesses or victims is a punishable offense, but kidnapping them in the fraudulent light of prosecution is more than serious, which includes without looking up the law off my memory THIRTY YEARS IN A FEDERAL PRISON.
Show Ten II. Tell Ten,